What's in a CHI Review?

Expertise

Rate your expertise in the topic area of this paper.

Contribution to HCI

State what contribution the paper makes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction in your view.

The Review

Write your review of the paper here. Please address each of the following 4 issues:

• Relevant previous work of which you are aware, against which this paper's contribution should be assessed.
• Significance of the paper's contribution to HCI and the benefit that others can gain from the contribution: why do the contribution and benefit matter?
• Validity of the work presented: how confidently can researchers and practitioners take up the results?
• Originality of the work: what new ideas or approaches are introduced?

We want to emphasize that an acceptable paper must make a clear contribution to Human-Computer Interaction. CHI values substance and contribution more than formality and perfection.

Areas for Improvement

Identify aspects of the paper's written presentation that need improvement, including:

Rating

• 5 - Definite accept: I would argue strongly for accepting this paper.
• 4 - Probably accept: I would argue for accepting this paper.
• 3 - Borderline: Overall I would not argue for accepting this paper.
• 2 - Probably reject: I would argue for rejecting this paper.
• 1 - Definite reject: I would argue strongly for rejecting this paper.

Additional Comments: